Essay About Teenagers: Computer Games, Internet, and Parental Control

Can it be Fair to manage the Time a teen Dedicates to Playing On-line games or Utilising the internet?

Modern teenagers have access to technologies that might be previously unfathomable. They have round-the-clock access to the internet through their gadgets, computers, and mobile devices. Playing video games has been yet another staple of adolescence, with countless hours spent in an electronic world of gaming.

It has been a cause for concern for a lot of parents, which includes sparked a debate concerning whether the time spent by teenagers on the net and playing video games should really be controlled. While this is a noteworthy issue, it could not be fair to regulate teenagers in this manner, as they would only resist additional get a grip on and find ways to indulge in a common activities regardless of any parental interference.

Internet usage is amongst the activities parents attempt to get a handle on. However , teens and adolescents are reported to know more about the internet and the digital world than their parents, rendering potential get a handle on limited (Wang et al. 1250). In line with the study conducted by Wang et al., 61% of parents get a handle on the amount of time their kiddies spend on the net (1253). Nevertheless , only 60% of parents and teens agree on the principles of get a handle on, and 40% do not agree with the rules or state you will find no rules. Additional variables included educational and gender factors of parents in assessing the requirement for get a handle on. All in all, parents make attempts to control the total amount of time, with varying results.

Video gaming take up a substantial amount of time for teenagers. Exactly like with internet usage, this can be a cause of concern for parents. Children who devote much attention to video gaming are considered to be addicted, even though the experience itself is known as to be highly engaging (Skoric et al. 567). The suggestion that participating in video games suggests higher academic achievements has revealed no correlation (570). Overall, teenagers devote a substantial amount of time to video games, causing some to trust it is an addiction; no specific correlation has been found between playing video gaming and better grades.

Despite both of these activities being a cause for concern in parents, the issue must be considered meticulously. Unless you can find signs of actual addictive behavior, no additional measures should be taken, especially if you can find otherwise no drawbacks to the activity. Teenagers tend to rebel against exorbitant control. At this time of their lives, they are quickly growing in to adults, making use of their own rules and axioms to guide them along the way. Further control of these free time activities will not only have a limited effect, but it may also be actively circumvented, undermining the control measures even more. In a nutshell, only some control should be exercised over a teenager’s activities; without specific signs of actual addiction or any drawbacks to true to life, teenagers must and should be left alone.

To conclude, surfing the web and playing video games are staples of a modern teenager or adolescent. They are a cause for concern for parents, with some considering these activities to be addictions. Nonetheless, without a good reason, it could not be fair to regulate teenagers a lot more than needed: they'll find a way to either circumnavigate or outright rebel against parental supervision. If these activities usually do not negatively affect their true to life, teenagers ought to be allowed to take part in them without additional get a grip on.

Works Cited

Skoric, Marko M., Linda Lay Ching Teo, and Rachel Lijie Neo. “Children and Video Games: Addiction, Engagement, and Scholastic Achievement. ” Cyberpsychology & Behavior vol. 12, no. 5, 2009, pp. 567-572.
Wang, Rong, Suzanne M. Bianchi, and Sara B. Raley. “Teenagers’ Internet Use and Family Rules: A Research Note. ” Journal of Marriage and Family vol. 67, number 5, December 2005, pp. 1249-1258.