Animal Testing Essay: Should People Use Animal Tested Cosmetics and Drugs?

Should People Use Animal Tested Cosmetics and Drugs to safeguard Themselves from Dangerous Consequences?

INTRODUCTION

It really is widely known that animals have long been used as the objects on which people carry out various experiments because of their purpose. Currently, people involve animals in a variety of types of researches: in medicine (drugs and injections), in biomedical research, and in the design of cosmetics. Animals are used for economic purposes; however , the peculiarities of the processes aren't highlighted for folks in open access.

There are particular ethical problems concerning animal testing in a variety of types of industries. I believe that the use of animals in the cosmetic industry is unethical and should be prohibited, while animal testing for medical purposes could be allowed, since it often saves human lives, but such testing should really be thoroughly regulated by regulations.

Pros and cons of animal testing

Even though animal testing sometimes brings benefits for humanity, the federal government has not developed unambiguous axioms concerning the usage of animals in cosmetic researches. That is why Peggs, in her investigation, argued that “more could be done to ensure transparency and to extricate the vested financial interests from the human health benefits” (624). It is because of the fact that each year millions of animals are beneath the threat of extinction from biomedical experiments, which are conducted for human health benefits. It becomes evident that many animal testing experiments are completed for human health benefits. This fact forces us to check out the moral side of the issue. Hence, the articulation of an ethical code here is significantly complicated. Regulations which exists today relates only to the usage of animals in the creation of drugs and vaccines. But you can find no identified principles regarding the use of animals in biomedical researches or in the cosmetic industry, which are widely developed today (“Background of the Issue”). It could be seen that the development and adoption of ethical principles regarding the use of animals as objects in various forms of research is of essential importance.

The specific situation with the cosmetics industry is much more complicated and controversial. I believe that the cosmetic industry and biomedical investigations are entirely different concepts because their initial purpose is different. With the aid of cosmetics people try to decorate themselves and improve those traits which are given of course. Their health will not deteriorate without it. But for the development of numerous cosmetic substances, people make animals, primarily rabbits, suffer because of the severe impact of those substances on the bodies. In the majority of cases, animals feel severe pain. Here, it is crucial to think philosophically and place the ecosystem in the middle when making any decision. The principle of ecocentrism inspires to treat nature and the ecosystem as equal to humans by their importance (Animal Ethics par. 2-3). People should maintain and support biodiversity which exists on the Earth as it ensures tens of thousands of processes which allow individuals to live on our planet. It is difficult to justify animal testing in the cosmetic sphere. Alternative types of testing cosmetics should be developed, as they is going to be crucial for both animals and people.

Conclusion

As they can be seen, animal testing is carried out for various purposes. Some of them may be justified, but others can not be. The case of animal testing now is easier to be judged due to the initial purpose. It is unethical and should perhaps not be conducted. Instead, other methods of cosmetic testing must be developed. Animal testing in the healthcare industry is more controversial. It can be supplied with the aim to bring advantageous assets to human health insurance and save huge numbers of people. But at precisely the same time, such testing destroys the biodiversity of the planet and is damaging to all living beings. The only method here could be the creation of proper codification which will account for both sides of the matter and abide by it.

Works Cited

Animal Ethics. “Why We Should Give Moral Consideration to Sentient Beings In the place of Ecosystems. ” Animal Ethics, 8 Sept. 2017, www.animal-ethics.org/sentience-section/relevance-of-sentience/why-we-should-consider-sentient-beings-rather-than-ecosystems/.
“Background of the Issue.” Should Animals Be utilized for Scientific or Commercial Testing?, ProCon. org, 24 May 2016, animal-testing. procon. org/view. resource. php? resourceID=006512.
Peggs, Kay. “An Insufferable Business: Ethics, non-human Animals and Biomedical Experiments. ” Animals, vol. 5, number 3, 2015, pp. 624–642., doi: 10. 3390/ani5030376.